("Crushes the threat of Mac malware!")Īvira seems like it's OK, but the lack of recent positive reviews makes me wary. Malwarebytes for Mac seems fine as far as it goes (trapping existing infections of common malware) but does it do anything beyond that? The marketing hype is insufferable. Intego Virus Scanner also seems to work well, is free, and has no real time feature. Feels like a minefield.ĬlamXAV 3 works well for me, and though it isn't free, I've used it for over a decade and am happy to support Mark Allan. There are so many entries in the Mac AV "space, it's almost impossible to sort through them all. The more detail you can provide the better. I'll just add a note here to thank all the reviewers. German companies are excused for occasional improper English. "If Avira Antivirus for Mac is already installed on a computer that is being upgraded to macOS 10.14 "Mojave," the first time the program is run (after the macOS upgrade) the user will be asked to supply the administrator password.ĭear MacUpdate: Please change "Will Avira Antivirus work good on macOS 10.13.4?" to "Will Avira Antivirus work well on macOS 10.13.4?" "Good" is not an adverb, it's an adjective. I'm going to guess that what you mean to say is, The third bullet point is incomprehensible. (Right? If not, please define "user permissions." And how do you know that "later" installations will also require extended setup.?They haven't even been released in beta.) Installation on macOS10.14 (or later) has an extended setup process, which requires administrator permissions. I note that they are the same as here:Īvira Antivirus for Mac 3.10.4 is compatible with macOS 10.14 "Mojave." The 3.10.4 Improvements as written above are poorly worded English.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |